Phil 347n week 4 case Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

PHIL 347N Week 4 Case Study

PHIL 347N Week 5 Discussion 2 Answers|CRITICAL REASONING Week 5 Discussion 2 Answers Analogies are situations where a person paints a picture with words; they help you to better understand a difficult concept or subject by providing an analogue using a concept or subject that is better known. See if you can create an analogy you might use in your career. Think about how to describe some process, procedure, or ailment to a patient who might not understand if you were using straight-forward langua...

PHIL-347N Week 4 Graded Discussion: Truth-Functional Logic Instructions • For the purposes of this document, we will use keys common on most computers. • The tilde (~) remains the same, but and will be represented by &, or will be represented by V, and If, then will be represented by >. Use capital T for true and capital F for false Part 1—Simple Claims (3 points × 6 = 18 total points) Instructions The simple claims below are from the textbook Exercise 7.6 (page 167). • Designate ...

PHIL 347N Week 4 Assignment: Deductive Reasoning Worksheet; Chamberlain Part A. Deductive Reasoning Instructions Select the correct answer for each multiple choice question. Example Select the answer that represents the proper standard form for the following statement: “A few bears are not mammals.” a. Not all bears are mammals b. Most bears are mammals c. Some bears are not mammals 1. A deductive argument is one in which the arguer attempts to demonstrate that a. The conclusion ...